Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes
3. Power as Inﬂuence 3.1 I-Power: A Probabilistic Notion In § 1.1 we said, by way of informal explanation, that the voting power of a member of a board, under a given decision rule, is the extent to which the member is able to control the outcome of a division of the board. We should now like to make this rough explanation more precise. In the voting-power literature there are in fact two diﬀerent interpretations of a voter’s ‘ability to control the outcome of a division’, corresponding to the two motivations of voting behaviour discussed in Com. 2.2.2. However, these two interpretations are seldom clearly distinguished; more often than not they are conﬂated with each other.1 From the policy-seeking viewpoint on voting, the outcome of a division is simply the passage or failure of the bill in question. A bill having been proposed, each member forms a position — for or against it — and votes accordingly.2 Rational voters presumably form their positions by comparing the expected payoﬀ of the bill’s passage with that of its failure (here ‘payoﬀ’ must of course be understood in a very broad sense). These payoﬀs vary from member to member and from bill to bill; but — for a given member and a given bill — they are quite independent of the decision rule operated by the board. 1 A notable exception is , where the distinction is made quite explicitly (see passages quoted in Com. 2.2.2). This distinction is ampliﬁed in [36...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.