Edited by Satvinder Singh Juss
Chapter 17: The art of drawing lines: future behaviour and refugee status
This chapter discusses the implications of the UK Supreme Court judgment on gay rights in HJ (Iran)  UKSC 31, which inspired a fierce debate among refugee law scholars on the role of a claimant’s acts, identity and rights, especially in a 2012 article by James Hathaway and Jason Pobjoy in 2012. The chapter argues that the reaction to that decision by Hathaway and Pobjoy’s article crystallises a broader dispute concerning a gay person’s future conduct in refugee law at the heart of refugee protection and how this debate systematises the two broad trends that literature and case law reveal, which are represented by the judgment and the article. The chapter proceeds thereafter to reflects on the reasons why the claimant’s future behaviour causes such trouble and suggests that the refugee law community might in fact be fighting over the ‘right’ solution to a different puzzle.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.