Edited by Satvinder Singh Juss
In cases where a refugee status is denied or revoked, host states generally require asylum seekers to leave the country. The removal of failed asylum seekers has over the last decades been a major political issue in Europe, North America and Australia. The political consternation is even stronger where a host country fails to remove applicants whose status is denied or revoked because of their (alleged) past or possible future involvement in (serious) crimes or because they are considered to pose a current or future security concern. This chapter explores and assesses the various policy options that states have to remove undesirable asylum seekers. It subsequently discusses voluntary return, forced return and relocation. It concludes by discussing situations in which none of these options exist and the undesirable asylum seeker is de facto ‘unreturnable’. In those instances host countries may either promote the prosecution of these individuals or provide ad hoc solutions, for example in the form of temporary leave to stay.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.