Knowledge Management and Intellectual Property
Show Less

Knowledge Management and Intellectual Property

Concepts, Actors and Practices from the Past to the Present

Edited by Stathis Arapostathis and Graham Dutfield

The book links the practices and regimes of the past with those of contemporary and emerging forms, covering the mid-19th century to the present. The contributors are noted scholars from various disciplines including history of science and technology, intellectual property law, and innovation studies. The chapters offer original perspectives on how proprietary regimes in knowledge production processes have developed as a socio-political phenomenon of modernity, as well as providing an analysis of the way individuals, institutions and techno-sciences interact within this culture.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Managing knowledge in ‘systematised plant breeding’: Mendelism and British agricultural science, 1900–1930

Berris Charnley


This was how Nature recorded the opening pleasantries of the Genetical Society’s 1944 symposium on the ‘Application of Genetics to Plant and Animal Breeding’. The theme is instantly recognisable even if the perspective is an unusual one. From the turn of the century, geneticists, or Mendelians as they were initially known, defined themselves in contrast to traditional plant and animal breeders. Furthermore, these early geneticists promised a revolution which would improve the lot of their breeder counter- parts. This is why Darlington’s perspective is unusual; surely by 1944 at least some of the promises of the early geneticists should have paid off? The idea that in the early part of the century science led the way; that attention to science, and in particular genetics, led to an improvement in the way breeders went about their business, would have been familiar to Nature’s readers.2 Yet by Darlington’s lights, and those of the assembled participants at the symposium, the question of how much genetics could give to the breeders was still an open one. The relationship between Mendelian theory and plant breeding has, over the years, been characterised in a number of different ways. In his 2005 book, Technology’s Dilemma, Jonathan Harwood gives an intriguing alter- native analysis of the development of agricultural education and research in Germany from 1860 to 1934. Harwood’s overarching concern is to explain the tendency of most institutes at which agricultural science (including plant breeding) developed to put a greater emphasis on the importance of basic science to the exclusion of practical knowledge (Harwood, 2005: 26).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.