Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties
Show Less

Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties

Edited by Christian J. Tams, Antonios Tzanakopoulos and Andreas Zimmermann

Offering a unique conceptual approach to the Law of Treaties this insightful Research Handbook not only sets out the foundational issues, but identifies tensions within the field, including formalism vs flexibility, integrity vs flexibility, and uniformity vs specialisation, to name a few. It seeks to define and re-define the dimensions in which Treaty law operates, tracing its fault-lines and the challenges it faces, such as breaches, regime-collisions, state succession and armed conflict. Representing a broad range of jurisdictional and ideological perspectives, the Research Handbook provides a diverse and stimulating approach to international treaties.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Theorizing treaties: The consequences of the contractual analogy

Akbar Rasulov


In every branch of social sciences, as JK Galbraith once noted, the ultimate test of truth always lies with the conventional wisdom, especially that part of it which is endorsed by the respective scientific community. Seen from this angle, the single most important thing that one would need to know about international legal theory today, undoubtedly, would be the fact that in the minds of most international lawyers presently the word ‘theory’ is most commonly associated with the ideas of fanciful gibberish, sophistry, and, depending on what one feels about modern academia more generally, a slightly offensive culture of verbal self-indulgence. A slightly less charitable reading would be to say that in the minds of most international lawyers today the concept of theory would be most accurately defined as: (i) a decidedly unpractical, selfconsciously speculative, jargon-heavy intellectual exercise that is (ii) ostensibly aimed at uncovering some form of deeper philosophical truth, the acquisition of which in the end, however, is certain to be of no evident benefit to anyone, save maybe for (iii) those who, following a logic not entirely dissimilar to that identified by Veblen behind the late 19th-century custom of building educational curricula in upper-class institutions around the study of dead languages and athletic pursuits, might see in it a talisman of some kind of hierarchically inspired symbolic status. For, indeed, if one of the best ways to broadcast the fact of one’s exclusive social position generally is ‘to put in evidence some

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.