Country Profiles from the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia
Edited by B. Guy Peters, Patrick von Maravić and Eckhard Schröter
The issue of group representation in public institutions has been at the heart of Indian politics since long before its independence in 1947. Given caste divisions and the ethnic, cultural, religious, and linguistic diversity of Indian society, this is hardly surprising. Politics of representation in India, however, do not primarily concern the question whether or not the state should build a representative bureaucracy. The need to do so is widely acknowledged and the Constitution of India supports staunch measures – such as reservations in the form of job quotas – to help realize it. Governments in the center and the states use that opportunity – on an unrivalled scale – to promote employment of lower castes or classes in the public sector. The Indian state is committed to enlarge representation in the bureaucracy of so-called “socially and educationally backward” groups. The latter is a constitutional category comprising an array of communities that make up about three-quarters of the population. From a comparative perspective, India’s commitment to representative bureaucracy is remarkable.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.