Handbook of Longitudinal Research Methods in Organisation and Business Studies
Show Less

Handbook of Longitudinal Research Methods in Organisation and Business Studies

Edited by Mélanie E. Hassett and Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki

This innovative Handbook demonstrates that there is no single best approach to conducting longitudinal studies. At their best, longitudinal research designs yield rich, contextualised, multilevel and deep understanding of the studied phenomenon. The lack of resources in terms of time, funding and people can pose a serious challenge to conducting longitudinal research. This book tackles many of these challenges and discusses the role of longitudinal research programmes in overcoming such obstacles.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Using quantitative longitudinal data to analyse the relationship between firms' internationalization and performance

Michael-Jörg Oesterle and Hannah N. Richta


Although researchers have been trying to investigate the internationalization–performance relationship for more than 40 years, due to heterogeneous results their results are still, at best, inconclusive. One assumed reason for the heterogeneous results is the neglect of the process character of internationalization in most of the studies (Glaumand Oesterle 2007; Oesterle and Richta 2013). On the one hand the idea that internationalization is a process is anything but new (e.g. Vernon 1966; Johanson and Vahlne 1977; Luostarinen 1979) and recent research also concludes that ‘internationalization processes still matter – perhaps even more so today’ (Barkema and Drogendijk 2007, p. 1144). On the other hand most of the numerous previous studies on the internationalization–performance relationship are based on cross-sectional data, or data including only short time intervals (Oesterle and Richta 2013). Given the restricted time horizon, the findings of the existing studies concern only the relationship between the static degree of internationalization and firm performance, but do not answer the question as to whether this relationship is stable over time (Gomes and Ramaswamy 1999; Kotabe et al.2002). However, it is reasonable to regard the relationship as unstable overtime, since both internal factors of the firm and the firm’s macroeconomic environment may change (Grant 1987; Geringer et al. 2000; Fisch and Oesterle 2003). Furthermore, the static approach does not take into account that there might be effects, such as organizational learning during the internationalization process, that also influence firms’ performance.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.