Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development
Show Less

Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development

Edited by Stuart J. Smyth, Peter W.B. Phillips and David Castle

This book is a compendium of knowledge, experience and insight on agriculture, biotechnology and development. Beginning with an account of GM crop adoptions and attitudes towards them, the book assesses numerous crucial processes, concluding with detailed insights into GM products. Drawing on expert perspectives of leading authors from 57 different institutions in 16 countries, it provides a unique, global overview of agbiotech following 20 years of adoption. Many consider GM crops the most rapid agricultural innovation adopted in the history of agriculture. This book provides insights as to why the adoption has occurred globally at such a rapid rate.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Agricultural biotechnology in India: impacts and controversies

Matin Qaim


India's agricultural research system had embarked upon modern biotechnology early on, with sizeable investments made by strong public and private sector research organizations. India was also one of the first countries in Asia to commercialize a genetically modified (GM) crop, namely insect-resistant cotton with inbuilt toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). Bt cotton was first commercialized in India in 2002, and was rapidly adopted by cotton farmers in the following years. By 2012, over 7 million farmers had adopted Bt cotton on 27 million acres (James, 2012). Today, India has the largest area under Bt cotton worldwide. Since the technology's introduction, national cotton production has increased tremendously, mostly as a result of higher yields (Rao and Dev, 2010; Cotton Corporation of India, 2012). This sounds like a big success story for Bt cotton. Indeed, several peer-reviewed studies that analysed impacts confirmed sizeable benefits for adopting farmers (Morse et al., 2005; Bennett et al., 2006; Qaim et al., 2006; Subramanian and Qaim, 2010). Nevertheless, public attitudes remain sceptical about the merits of Bt cotton technology. Anti-biotech interest groups reports have highlighted incidents such as failures of this technology in farmers' fields, exploitation of smallholder farmers through seed companies, and disruption of traditional cultivation practices (Sahai and Rahman, 2003; Shiva et al., 2011). There have also been repeated claims of a causal link between Bt cotton and farmer suicides observed in cotton belts of India (Coalition for a GM-Free India, 2012).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.