Research Handbook on International Law and Terrorism
Show Less

Research Handbook on International Law and Terrorism

Edited by Ben Saul

This Handbook brings together leading scholars and practitioners to examine the prolific body of international laws governing terrorism. It exhaustively covers the global response to terrorism in transnational criminal law, the international law on the use of force, international humanitarian law, international human rights law, the law of State responsibility, the United Nations Security Council, General Assembly, UN specialised bodies, and regional organisations. It also addresses special legal issues in dealing with terrorism such as gender, religion, victims of terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, and customary law.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 20: International human rights law and terrorism: An overview

Helen Duffy


The tension between counter-terrorism and human rights is, like terrorism itself, nothing new. The experience gained over decades and across continents – of terrorism, counter-terrorism, and the application of human rights law in situations from Chechnya to Colombia, Ireland to Egypt, or Turkey to Sri Lanka and beyond – contributed to a fairly developed body of international human rights law (IHRL) in relation to terrorism long before it shot to the top of the international agenda after 11 September 2001. Since then, international practice in counter-terrorism has proliferated, with a plethora of normative and political developments at the national, regional and international levels. The effects of this practice for human rights and the rule of law have been wide-ranging, an analysis of which goes beyond scope of this short chapter. It is clear, however, that on one level this experience has demonstrated the fragility of respect for IHRL in the face of the threat of international terrorism. While terrorism itself has dire consequences for human rights, counter-terrorism practices have in turn jeopardized, strained and violated most if not all aspects of the human rights framework. Systematic resort to torture, supported by a complex network of international partners, or attempts to ‘justify’ transfer to torture as a suitable ‘balance’ against national security, has represented the potential unravelling of the very minimum core of IHRL.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.