Chapter 1: Researching creativity and creativity research
Restricted access

This chapter is a meditation on how research on creativity has developed over the last few decades and includes some suggestions of its future direction. At first glance such a project seems straightforward enough: there are countless accounts of how creativity research has evolved both in detail (see, for example, Mayer 1999; Sawyer 2012) and in summary (see chapters in this volume by Miettinen, McIntyre, Zimmerman).From these accounts we get a fair idea of how different researchers have tried to make sense of the concept of creativity to find ways of fostering creative thinking and achievements. A quick read of the chapters in this volume would suggest that creativity research is far from homogeneous and in fact it is a diverse and porous field. It is not always clear who qualifies or identifies as a ‘creativity researcher’, and there are contestations and disagreements among researchers about some of the core issues relating to creativity. For example, whether creativity should always be regarded as something positive has been challenged by some of the contributors (see chapters by De Cock, Rehn and Berry; Cropley, Kaufman and Cropley; McGuigan; jagodzinksi in this volume).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account
Edited by Kerry Thomas and Janet Chan