Neighbourhood Governance in Urban China
Show Less

Neighbourhood Governance in Urban China

Edited by Ngai-Ming Yip

As the economy and society of China has become more diversified, so have its urban neighbourhoods. The last decade has witnessed a surge in collective action by homeowners in China against the infringement of their rights. Research on neighbourhood governance is sparse and limited so this book fills a vital gap in the literature and understanding.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Altering the rules: homeowners' participation in legislation

Yihong Jiang


In August 2003 the homeowners' committee in Dongyue Estate, Guangzhou, filed a lawsuit against their property developer when the elevator in their housing estate needed maintenance and the property management company, a subsidiary of the developer, declined to pay for it. The controversy was rooted in the inconsistency in regulations between different levels of government. The developer argued that, according to the national regulation, homebuyers should pay the sinking fund (for long-term maintenance) to the developer (2-3 per cent of the housing price) (Regulations on the Maintenance Fund for Common Facilities in Residential Areas, 1998). However, the homeowners' committee counter-argued that local legislation require property developers to transfer the sinking fund to the homeowners' committee once it was set up (Guangdong Property Management Ordinance, 1998; Interim Measures on Regulating Housing Maintenance Fund, 2000), but the developer had not complied. In fact, the exploitation of this regulatory loophole by real-estate developers was not only happening in this particular estate, but was also a rampant practice in Guangzhou at the time. In many cases the account for the maintenance fund had either not been set up at all, or the collected funding never reached the account. According to the best information, the total amount of missing funds was large - even the more conservative estimate provided by the Guangzhou municipal government put the total amount at RMB 0.9 billion from 1999 to 2003 (Han and Li, 2006). This indicates the severity of the problem.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.