Leadership and Cooperation in Academia
Show Less

Leadership and Cooperation in Academia

Reflecting on the Roles and Responsibilities of University Faculty and Management

Edited by Roger Sugden, Marcela Valania and James R. Wilson

Across the world academic institutions are being questioned by their stakeholders and pressured to change. Answering these questions requires that academics and professional managers in universities think about their work, its value and organisation. The book highlights the need for space and stimulus to reflect on the responsibilities, roles and expectations that they identify for themselves, and that others place upon them – then, they might be better able to understand and to act. Similarly, policymakers and higher education commentators need the space and stimulus to reflect on the role of universities. This book will provide this space and an invaluable contribution to the stimulus.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: The development of action research processes and their impacts on socio-economic development in the Basque Country

Mari Jose Aranguren, James Karlsen, Miren Larrea and James R. Wilson


As reflected in several other contributions to this volume, there is strong debate around the role that universities and their academics should play in the societies in which they are situated, with respect to both their teaching and their research activities. In particular, academia is asked to contribute actively to processes of territorial socio-economic development. This debate is supported by compelling normative arguments about the benefits of such active contribution, as reflected in well-known concepts such as ‘mode 2 knowledge production’ (Gibbons et al. 1994), ‘the triple helix’ (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 1997; 2000), ‘strategic research’ (Rip 2004) or the ‘third mission’ of universities (Laredo 2007). Indeed, in their comparative review of a range of such knowledge production concepts, Hessels and van Lente (2008: 755) conclude: [T]he claim that the content of scientific research agenda is currently changing recurs in all diagnoses: all address a turn towards more relevant research, research that (sooner or later) may lead to applications in the form of innovations or policy. Furthermore, all approaches point to more interactive relationships between science, industry and government.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.