Edited by Biswa Nath Bhattacharyay, Masahiro Kawai and Rajat M. Nag
Chapter 9: Managing regional infrastructure: European Union institutional structures and best practices
The European Union (EU) has accumulated much of its power in an ad hoc and pragmatic way. This pragmatism was found in the earliest statements by one of its founders, Jean Monnet, who famously argued that the ‘union between individuals or communities is not natural; it can only be the result of an intellectual process . . . having as a starting point . . . the need for change. Its driving force must be the common interests between individuals or communities’. This ‘neo-functionalist’ thinking prompted the well-known Schuman declaration that ‘Europe . . . will be built through concrete achievements which first create a de facto solidarity’. In the words of Moussis, a long-term observer of European integration, the neo-functionalist assumptions have ‘proved correct by European experience’ (Moussis 2007). This pragmatic way of proceeding has also characterized the distribution of functions in economic integration between different types of actors with different levels of competence and authority. As Molle has argued, ‘neither the optimum mix of union and national measures nor the areas where further integration will be most beneficial can be determined a priori on theoretical grounds’ (Molle 1994: 23).
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.