Handbook of Research on the Learning Organization
Show Less

Handbook of Research on the Learning Organization

Adaptation and Context

Edited by Anders Örtenblad

This timely Handbook establishes the ‘contextualization’ of the learning organization idea as a research field. In contrast to much of the previous literature, which has approached the learning organization as a panacea that every organization could and should adopt, this major new Handbook puts the learning organization into context. It examines the relevance of the learning organization idea to organizations in various specific contexts, employing examples from a wide variety of cultures including China and Islamic nations, and from industries as diverse as the police force, care services for the elderly and family firms.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Developing learning organizations in China

Jacky F.L. Hong, Robin Stanley Snell and Mian Lin


After more than two decades of development since the publication of Senge’s (1990) The Fifth Discipline, the learning organization still remains an elusive concept with diverse interpretations and understandings (Örtenblad 2002, 2004). Attempts to encapsulate the multifaceted natur e of the learning organization into a short definition include casting it as an organization that ‘facilitates the learning of its members and continuously transforms itself ’ (Pedler et al. 1991, p. 1), and as one that is ‘skilled at creating, acquiring and transferring knowledge, and at modifying its behavior to reflect new knowledge and insights’ (Garvin 1993, p. 80). While the learning organization may be construed as a set of rhetorical ideals (Symon 2002), emphasizing empowerment, personal development and shared vision, some critics question the integrity of the managerial motives for developing a learning organization (Coopey 1998; Snell & Chak 1998). It is possible for the espoused ideals of the learning organization to be used by managements to justify change initiatives (Snell 2002) that compromise or even sacrifice the vested interests of employee stakeholders, especially those at the front line, who as a result find themselves ‘working in a world with little job security’ (Armstrong 2000, p. 356).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.