Edited by William A. Schabas and Shannonbrooke Murphy
The perceived legitimacy of international courts and tribunals is crucial for their success, in terms of acceptance of, and compliance with, their judgments and engagement with their processes. At various points in their history, most international courts have been accused of lacking legitimacy, either because their procedures are seen as unfair, or because they have been established through irregular means, or because they are too far removed from the reality of the disputes that they adjudicate upon. This chapter analyses two overarching conceptions of the notion of legitimacy – constitutive legitimacy and process legitimacy – in the context of international courts and tribunals. It then discusses the impact of legitimacy for the administration of international justice, and highlights how some of the ways in which international tribunals appear to be lacking in legitimacy can be overcome. KEYWORDS: legitimacy, fairness, international courts, international justice
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.