Restoring America’s Global Competitiveness through Innovation
Show Less

Restoring America’s Global Competitiveness through Innovation

Edited by Ben L. Kedia and Subhash C. Jain

Though we live in an era of rapid innovation, the United States has introduced comparatively few commercial innovations within the past decade. Innovation shortfall contributes to weaker trade performance, decreased productivity growth, lower wages and many other economic woes. This study provides insightful recommendations for developing enhanced innovation efforts that could help foster substantial, long-term economic growth.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Information asymmetry and underpricing: the impact of innovation strategy and underwriter mediation

Tera L. Galloway, Douglas R. Miller, Sang Kyun Kim, Jonathan D. Arthurs and Sam Yul Cho


Becoming publicly traded is a big step in the life of a new venture and it allows the firm to raise capital for future growth. However, an unfortunate downside to the initial public offering (IPO) is that the new venture often leaves quite a bit of capital ‘on the table’ through underpricing. In a typical IPO, a new venture floats its shares of stock through an underwriter. The underwriter offers the shares to a group of institutional investors and any leftover shares are sold on the market on the first day of trading. Underpricing occurs when the difference between the offer price of the new venture’s stock, the amount of capital raised by the IPO firm, is less than the value of the firm (its closing price) on the first day of trading (Loughran and Ritter, 2004). The issue of underpricing remains an interesting enigma for both entrepreneurship and finance scholars. Understanding why it occurs can help firms maximize the capital raised, which may lead to greater performance following IPO. Rock’s (1986) theory of information asymmetry suggests that a lack of information about an IPO can lead to underpricing because of the ex ante uncertainty, cognitive limitations or bounded rationality. First, in the ‘winner’s curse’ model, Rock (1986) posited that some investors may be perfectly informed about the value of the IPO while others are uninformed.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.