Authentic Leadership
Show Less

Authentic Leadership

Clashes, Convergences and Coalescences

Edited by Donna Ladkin and Chellie Spiller

The majority of authentic leadership literature focuses on the individual leader. However, the authors in this volume expertly focus on the premise that leadership is a relational phenomenon and not something that can be distilled down to the actions of one leader, be they authentic or not.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 17: Viewpoint: authentic and political leadership: opposite ends of the same continuum?

B. Parker Ellen, Ceasar Douglas, Pamela L. Perrewé and Gerald R. Ferris


The dozens of authentic leadership definitions that populate the organizational sciences literature make it difficult to accurately and effectively position authentic leadership in relation to political skill and political leadership. Despite the lack of a precise and universally accepted definition of authentic leadership, there seems to be an assumption that it is devoid of anything political. Some may even argue that authentic leadership and political leadership differ so fundamentally that they occupy opposite poles of the same continuum of leadership behavior. This chapter revisits the relationship between authentic leadership and political behavior, and considers whether the two constructs actually are more alike than their typical presentation suggests. The popular press has promulgated the view that authentic and political behaviors are poles apart, with the labeling of manipulative acts as ‘political’, fostering the belief that any political behavior is inherently self-serving. Conversely, behavior described as ‘authentic’ is perceived to be altruistic, as evidenced by a piece that appeared in The Leadership Quarterly special issue on authentic leadership, including ‘the root of positive forms of leadership’ in the title (Avolio and Gardner 2005, p. 315). This conceptualization is unfortunate because it leads to the belief that all things political are detrimental to organizations and that all things authentic are beneficial. The trouble is that we often can’t tell authentic leadership and authentic leader behaviors from those that aren’t. Additionally, the appearance of authenticity doesn’t always indicate the presence of selfless acts, and the existence of political behaviors need not indicate self-serving motives counter to organizational goals.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.