Climate Change and Flood Risk Management
Show Less

Climate Change and Flood Risk Management

Adaptation and Extreme Events at the Local Level

Edited by E. Carina H. Keskitalo

Climate Change and Flood Risk Management discusses and problematises the integration of adaptation to climate change in flood risk management. The book explores adaptation to climate change in relation to flood risk events in advanced industrial states. It provides examples of how flood risk management, disaster and emergency management, and adaptation to climate change may intersect in a number of European and Canadian cases.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Flooding and the Carrot River Watershed Source Water Protection Plan, Saskatchewan: civic engagement and causal stories

Merle Massie


Over the past few decades internationally, there has been a sea change in how governments choose to manage climate change, and participate in environmental and water governance. Whereas a top-down, ‘command and control’ perspective once dominated, policy creation has increasingly turned toward a more collective and collaborative model that includes multi-sector actors from both inside and outside government (World Bank 2003; Hurlbert and Corkal 2009; Hurlbert et al. 2009; Simms and de Loë 2010). As Hurlbert and Corkal note, ‘Citizen engagement and feedback are essential requirements to achieve successful adaptations to cope with climate stress’ (Hurlbert and Corkal 2009: 236). A related innovation in international water policy has been the move to Integrated Water Management (IWM, sometimes also called Integrated Water Resources Management [IWRM]), an often place-based holistic exercise that seeks to integrate multiple perspectives, interests, jurisdictions, government levels, and stakeholders to engage in integrated discussions relating to water. For example, the EU Water Directive and the subsequent EU Floods Directive requires water and flood planning on a basin scale, which solicits local and regional perspectives (Hall and Penning-Rowsell 2010). Canadian researchers in water governance call these approaches ‘experiments in new ways of sharing responsibilities for water-related decisions’ (Simms and de Loë 2010: iv).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.