Chapter 21: Lies, damn lies, and negotiation: An interdisciplinary analysis of the nature and consequences of deception at the bargaining table
Restricted access

This chapter considers what ethicists say normatively about deception in negotiation, and what social scientists report empirically about the causes, forms, and consequences of deceptive behavior. Following brief definitions of lying and deception, we describe normative approaches found in the business ethics literature that address negotiator bluffing. We then summarize empirical social science research on deception, highlighting work in social psychology and communication theory on lying and its detection. A discussion of (mainly) empirical work on deceptive behavior in negotiation follows, including informational forms of deceptions as well as strategic simulation or suppression of emotions. A concluding section highlights four research needs: greater methodological variety, more focus on cultural context, expanded attention to moral psychology, and better integration between normative and social scientific perspectives.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account
Handbook