Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University
Show Less

Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University

Edited by Alain Fayolle and Dana T. Redford

This insightful Handbook offers a lens through which to view entrepreneurship strategy for higher education institutions, as it becomes increasingly necessary for universities to consider changing their strategies, culture and practices to become more entrepreneurial.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Managing the improvement of entrepreneurship education programmes: a comparison of universities in the life sciences in Europe, USA and Canada

Vincent Blok, Rob Lubberink, Thomas Lans and Onno Omta


A central feature of the transition towards an entrepreneurial university is the development of an entrepreneurship education programme. Following Etzkowitzís definition of the entrepreneurial university as a ënatural incubator, providing support structures for teachers and students to initiate new venturesí (Etzkowitz, 2003, p. 112), entrepreneurship education can be seen as one of its three key missions (cf. Guerrero, 2008). Furthermore, the development and implementation of entrepreneurship courses and other activities that favour student attitudes towards entrepreneurship can be seen as factors that potentially facilitate the development of entrepreneurial universities (Kirby et al., 2011). In this chapter we contribute to the literature on the entrepreneurial university by focusing on research-based interventions to implement or improve the entrepreneurship education programme. To this end, a benchmark study is executed in a specific domain of the life sciences in Europe, USA and Canada: the agri-food sciences. The focus on entrepreneurship in a specific domain is important, because learning is generally thought to be domain or context specific (Brown et al., 1989; Rae, 2006). Benchmarking is a method that is developed in order to determine the best practices and analyse the similarities and differences in activities that lead to higher or lower performance (Jackson and Lund, 2000).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.