Edited by Robert M. Solow and Jean-Philippe Touffut
Chapter 6: Booms and busts: New Keynesian and behavioural explanations
Capitalism is characterized by booms and busts, by periods of strong growth in output followed by periods of declines in economic growth. Every macroeconomic theory should attempt to explain these endemic business cycle movements. How does the New Keynesian (dynamic stochastic general equilibrium – DSGE) model explain booms and busts in economic activity? And how does an alternative, behavioural model explain these features? These are the questions analysed in this chapter. In order to answer such questions, it is useful to present some stylized facts about the cyclical movements of output. Figure 6.1 shows the movements of the output gap in the USA since 1960. We observe strong cyclical movements. They imply that there is strong autocorrelation in the output gap numbers, that is, the output gap in period t is strongly correlated with the output gap in period t_1. The intuition is that if there are cyclical movements, we will observe clustering of good and bad times. A positive (negative) output gap is likely to be followed by a positive (negative) output gap in the next period. That is what we find for the US output gap over the period 1960–2009: the autocorrelation coefficient is 0.94. Similar autocorrelation coefficients are found in other countries.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.