Edited by Padideh Ala’i and Robert G. Vaughn
Chapter 8: When transparency meets politics: the case of Mexico’s electoral ballots
The refusal to provide citizen access to the electoral ballots used in Mexico’s hotly contested 2006 presidential elections is an excellent case study of how public authorities can use the “rule of law” to subordinate transparency to political concerns. Mexico theoretically has one of the most highly developed access-to-information regimes and systems of electoral law in the world. But in this case, the sophisticated system of specialized institutional oversight and checks and balances was used to nullify citizen rights and violate due process rather than to guarantee them. If in such a context the authorities are willing to bend the law in order to protect political concerns from the risks of “overexposure,” the risks are even higher in other regimes where the legal framework for accountability is less highly developed, as is the case in most of the so-called “developed” world. This historic case stands as a warning against complacency in the advancement of freedom of information (FOI) laws throughout the globe and as a cautionary tale in favor of including direct citizen control and participation mechanisms in oversight bodies and procedures. The 2006 Mexican presidential election was decided by only 0.56 percent, or 233,000 of approximately 41 million votes cast.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.