Carbon Pricing, Growth and the Environment
Show Less

Carbon Pricing, Growth and the Environment

Edited by Larry Kreiser, Ana Yábar Sterling, Pedro Herrera, Janet E. Milne and Hope Ashiabor

The emphasis of the book lies in finding critical solutions to global climate change including chapters on environmental fiscal reform and unemployment in Spain, EU structural and cohesion policy and sustainable development, ecological tax reform in Europe and Asia, Australia’s carbon pricing mechanism, and many other timely topics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Towards sustainable carbon markets: requirements for effective, efficient, and fair emissions trading schemes

Sven Rudolph, Christine Lenz, Achim Lerch and Barbara Volmert


Although economists have emphasized the merits of emissions trading for decades (Tietenberg 2006), and they have even proven emissions trading schemes’ (ETS) applicability, for example in traditional clean air policy in the USA (Ellerman et al. 2000), it took until the Kyoto Protocol of 1997 to introduce this instrument in climate policy. The EU ETS of 2005 was the first supranational carbon market, but the results were ambiguous in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, and distribution for the first two trading phases; however, significant improvements are expected after 2012 (Ellerman et al. 2010). Besides the EU, carbon markets are implemented, for example in Japan, New Zealand, and the northeastern USA, while their use is considered in many other countries. Despite their merits, the detrimental ecological, economic, and distributional effects of ETS have been heavily criticized (Altvater and Brunnengräber 2008). While some critique is exaggerated, still most carbon markets in practice are not based on ambitious sustainability criteria. Nevertheless, effective, efficient, and just climate protection is undoubtedly necessary, because unrestrained climate change will cause unpredictable and irreversible damage to the ecosystems (IPCC 2007), induce adaptation costs way beyond the costs of mitigation (Stern 2007), and inflict unethical harm to present as well as future generations (WCED 1987). Despite ongoing debates on the definition of sustainability and the even widespread abuse of the term (Pezzey and Toman 2002), the definition by the Brundtland Commission (WCED 1987: 43) and the operationalization by Munasinghe (1992) are still helpful.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.