The Making of Ageing Policy
Show Less

The Making of Ageing Policy

Theory and Practice in Europe

Edited by Rune Ervik and Tord Skogedal Lindén

Demographic changes transform societies and challenge existing institutional solutions and policies. The need for policies addressing these challenges has increasingly been put on the agenda. The Making of Ageing Policy analyzes these innovative policy ideas and practices at both the international and the national level.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Pension policy recommendations of governmental commissions in Norway, Denmark, Germany and the UK

Tord Skogedal Lindén


This chapter investigates the role of governmental commissions in welfare reform processes by posing three questions. First, which problems and challenges concerning pensions and ageing are identified by the commissions? Second, what do they recommend? Third, have the recommendations resulted in reforms? An important strand in the literature on welfare reforms concerns when reform is possible. Pierson (1994) has identified a variety of blame avoidance strategies, for example, presenting policy in such a way that its negative consequences are less visible (obfuscation). Schludi (2005, 2008) and Natali and Rhodes (2008) have studied how governments can reach agreements with opposition parties and social partners to avoid veto players blocking change, while Overbye (2008) emphasizes that governments through the right framing can make reforms appear necessary and sensible. This chapter contributes to this research literature by focusing on what can be seen as a blame avoidance strategy: establishing governmental commissions to propose changes in Norway, Denmark, Germany and the UK. Research on governmental commissions and welfare reform has often applied a national perspective, providing comparisons within rather than across countries (see, for instance, Hort 2005 and Marier 2008b on Sweden; Schulz and van Twist 2009 on the Netherlands; Pedersen 2009 on Norway; Siefken 2006a, 2006b, 2007, Schulze and Jochem 2007, Fleckenstein 2008 and Kropp 2003 on Germany; Klitgaard and Norgaard 2009, Klitgaard and Christiansen 2009, and Christensen et al. 2009a on Denmark; and Hills 2006a, 2006b on the UK).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.