Handbook of Governance and Security
Show Less

Handbook of Governance and Security

Edited by James Sperling

The Handbook of Governance and Security examines the conceptual evolution of security governance and the different manifestations of regional security governance. In particular, James Sperling brings together unique contributions from leading scholars to explore the role of institutions that have emerged as critical suppliers of security governance and the ever-widening set of security issues that can be viewed profitably through a governance lens.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: South America

Rodrigo Tavares


On several occasions South American heads of state have officially declared the region to be a zone of peace. A significant number of academic publications have also conceived South America as a ‘pluralistic security community’ (Deutsch et al. 1957; Dom'nguez 2007: 111–12; Hurrell 1998; Jervis 2002: 9; Kacowicz 1998: 121, 2000: 216; Oelsner 2003), that is, a transnational region comprised of sovereign states that have dependable expectations of peaceful change. This proposition is predicated on the idea that the threats affecting the region are of a military nature and stresses the absence of militarized interstate conflict since 1995 (Peru–Ecuador). Traditionally, the concept of security has generally been addressed in the context of ‘national security’ and ‘public security’. National security involves the defense of sovereignty, including the legitimate defense of territorial boundaries, internal order and sufficient political and economic stability to permit functioning of state institutions. If considered in this light, South America could possibly be regarded as a zone of peace. Although this proposition is not false, it is certainly incomplete, and is so for three main reasons. First, the original premise only considers interstate conflicts. The regional integration processes have contributed to the cementing of regional norms of cooperation, at least among the South American foreign policy elites. Interstate violence has declined dramatically and the only post-Cold War interstate conflict was the one between Peru and Ecuador. A narrow focus on militarized interstate conflicts excludes intrastate armed conflicts as a source of regional insecurity.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.