Edited by Scott O. Farrow and Richard Zerbe, Jr.
Chapter 4: Principles and standards for the benefit–cost analysis of crime
Criminal justice involves many trade-offs. Are we spending enough on police? What are the levels of penalties for different crimes? Are there trade-offs between different types of penalties? For example, does greater reliance on criminal penalties reduce the reliance on reputational penalties? One complicated example is the death penalty. There is still some debate over the deterrence effect of the death penalty. But even if one accepts that such deterrence exists, how large does that effect have to be to outweigh the costs? The legal process for the death penalty is costly. What are the costs of accidentally convicting innocent individuals? The death penalty might save imprisonment costs after a certain point, but executions are so delayed that the present value of those costs might be small. Numbers cannot easily be assigned to all these costs and benefits, but it is still possible to give examples of how large different values have to be for people to change their decisions on whether the death penalty passes a benefit–cost-type test.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.