Chapter 2: Protection of well-known marks: a transnational perspective
Restricted access

From its vigorous support of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement)to the current push in favor of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA),the United States has been at the forefront in encouraging the effective protection of intellectual property rights worldwide. This is hardly surprising because the United States is the largest producer country of informational assets in the world and has reason to assure that those assets are protected abroad. In this chapter, I wish to discuss a departure in the general thrust of American policy in the international protection of what one might call ìits first world assets.î I refer to the failure of United States law to create a coherent policy in the protection of well-known marks despite its treaty obligations under Article 6bis of the Paris Convention,which requires member countries to protect marks that are well known in a member country even though they are not registered or used in the protecting country. United States case law is in disarray on this issue and, for the moment, there seems to be no interest to remedy the problem legislatively. Some courts believe that the current provisions of the Lanham Actare sufficient to accommodate the well-known marks doctrine, but most do not.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account
Edited by Irene Calboli and Edward Lee
Monograph Book