Patent Law in Greater China
Show Less

Patent Law in Greater China

Edited by Stefan Luginbuehl and Peter Ganea

This book provides a comprehensive introduction to patent policy, law and practice in Greater China and will be a go-to book for patent practitioners who have client interests in that region.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content


Thomas Pattloch


Only a decade ago, an observer of the Chinese economy would have laughed at the prediction that a Chinese anti-monopoly law would be actively applied. Today, in 2013, news about the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) investigating price-fixing behaviours by baby powder producers (including their relationship between manufacturers, distributors and retailers), fining LCD panel manufacturers for price-fixing cartelsand probing drug pricing govern the headlines of the China Daily and Financial Times. No doubt, anti-monopoly law is about to become an actively applied part of the Chinese legal system. Work on relevant legislation started as early as 1987. In 1994, the drafting of a cartel law was finally included in the Legislative Plan of the National People’s Congress. The Anti-Monopoly Law AML was passed on 30 August 2007 and became effective on 1 August 2008. The drafting process had been a difficult issue which also involved turf battles between different Chinese authorities. Very quickly within the first year of enacting the new law, all involved enforcement agencies demonstrated a proactive approach on gathering expertise and improving the enforcement transparency and certainty. A plethora of related administrative regulations has been passed since. The legislator’s foundation of an actively applied anti-monopoly law is still under construction and currently still appears somewhat influenced by case law and experiences from US and European counterparts. The following overview only lists the most important laws and regulations which can be applied to anti-monopoly cases. Some general laws such as the Contract Act in its Article 329 also contain provisions which may be applicable in individual cases:

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.