Valuing Ecosystem Services
Show Less

Valuing Ecosystem Services

Methodological Issues and Case Studies

Edited by K. N. Ninan

Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services is critical to promoting human welfare and sustainable development. Ecosystem services valuation has therefore recently assumed prominence in research and policy circles. In this illuminating volume, leading experts from around the world discuss the key methodological issues and challenges in valuing ecosystem services. Covering a cross-section of ecosystems and services in different sites, countries and regions, the collection also usefully presents case studies that value ecosystem services and experiences with operationalising valuation into policy.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Valuing forest ecosystem services: what we know and what we don’t

K.N. Ninan and Makoto Inoue


Ecosystem services valuation has achieved considerable prominence in research and policy circles in recent years, especially since the publication of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005), which emphasized the importance of biodiversity to ecosystem services, human well-being and sustainable development. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) initiative by United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and European Commission (EC), and the set-up of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) testify to the importance these groups place on ecosystem services valuation. International conferences; special issues of journals, such as Ecological Economics (see Vol. 41, 2002; Vol. 64(2), 2007; Vol. 69(7), 2010), on ecosystem services valuation; and the launch of a new journal, titled Ecosystem Services, further highlight the growing importance of the field. The underlying premise of the economic valuation of biodiversity and ecosystem services is that if proper values are assigned, then policymakers will make better informed decisions. However, a number of people have reservations about applying economic valuations and conventional cost–benefit analyses (CBA) to biodiversity and ecosystem services and argue for relying on plural approaches to justify conservation (Norgaard, 2010). Economic valuation, however, does not imply that other perspectives for better management of the environment must be neglected. This approach simply seeks to convey that proper valuation of environmental goods and services will lead to better conservation outcomes. Studies that estimate the economic value of ecosystem services cover a broad cross-section of ecosystems and sites in different countries and regions.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.