Edited by Cheryl Lawther, Luke Moffett and Dov Jacobs
Chapter 16: Transitional justice and the end of impunity: Hybrid tribunals
Hybrid tribunals combine elements of domestic and international justice in an effort to develop a criminal justice response to mass atrocity that has the potential for greater impact than conventional international or domestic courts. This chapter describes some of the basic features of these tribunals and situates them in relation to other institutions and alternative programs of transitional justice. After a discussion of each tribunal’s unique features and some of their major cases, the chapter turns to the central goals of transitional justice, such as ensuring stability, establishing the rule of law and allowing a society to properly process the collective trauma that they have undergone as well as the unique role that some of these tribunals have played in this process. The chapter then examines the extent to which these tribunals provide a promising alternative to other institutions of transitional justice, along with some concerns about the reliance on criminal justice as a tool for transitional justice. Hybrid tribunals; impunity; stability; rule of law; redress
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.