International Intellectual Property
Show Less

International Intellectual Property

A Handbook of Contemporary Research

Edited by Daniel J. Gervais

International Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research provides researchers and practitioners of international intellectual property law with the necessary tools to understand the latest debates in this incredibly dynamic and complex field. The book contains both doctrinal analyses and groundbreaking theoretical research by many of the most recognized leading experts in the field. It offers overviews of the major international instruments, with specific chapters on the Berne and Paris Conventions, the Patent Cooperation treaty and several chapters that discuss parts of the TRIPS Agreement. The book can also be used by students of international intellectual property to obtain useful knowledge of major institutions and instruments, and to gain an understanding of ongoing discussions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: The non-multilateral approach to international intellectual property normsetting

Peter K. Yu


The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) entered into force on 1 January 1995. Although developed countries obtained most of their preferred terms during the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations (Uruguay Round), negotiators from less developed countries – which, in WTO parlance, include both developing and least developed countries – managed to inject ambiguities, flexibilities, limitations and exceptions into the TRIPS Agreement. As a result, the Agreement is now filled with vague, broad, undefined and result-oriented terms such as ‘“effective”, “reasonable”, “undue”, “unwarranted”, “fair and equitable”, and “not … unnecessarily complicated or costly”’. As reflected in China – Measures Affecting the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, Part III of the TRIPS Agreement is notoriously ineffective. Immediately after the adoption of the TRIPS Agreement, commentators were quick to extol the benefits of marrying intellectual property to trade. As Michael Ryan noted, such a marriage has allowed member states to ‘achieve treaties in diplomatically and politically difficult areas in which agreement would otherwise be elusive’. Commentators have also considered the establishment of the mandatory dispute settlement process as a crowning achievement of the Uruguay Round. In an interview, Jacques Gorlin even proudly declared that the Intellectual Property Committee – an ad hoc coalition of major US corporations he led that successfully lobbied for the TRIPS Agreement – obtained 95 percent of what it wanted.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.