Building the Knowledge Economy in Europe
Show Less

Building the Knowledge Economy in Europe

New Constellations in European Research and Higher Education Governance

Edited by Meng-Hsuan Chou and Åse Gornitzka

Building the Knowledge Economy in Europe investigates the integration of emerging knowledge policy domains on the European political agenda, and the dynamics of this in relation to knowledge policies. Professors Meng-Hsuan Chou and Åse Gornitzka bring together leading experts who address the two central pillars of the ‘Europe of Knowledge’, research and higher education, to reveal the vertical, horizontal and sequential tensions in European knowledge governance
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: The evolution of the European Research Area as an idea in European integration

Meng-Hsuan Chou


'Research and innovation' has recently been moved closer to the top of the political and legislative agenda of the European Union (EU) - the most advanced form of existing supranational cooperation. At the heart of these developments is the completion of the European Research Area (ERA) by 2014. According to Article 179 of the Lisbon Treaty, which entered into force in December 2009, the ERA would be an area within which 'researchers, scientific knowledge and technology circulate freely' (Official Journal of the European Union 2010, p. C 83/128). Yet this notion of a common scientific space where the mobility of knowledge is unhindered is as old as the EU itself. How can we account for its emergence, evolution and survival? This chapter sets out to address this question and is structured as follows. First, I discuss briefly the idea of the ERA and the 'fifth freedom'. Next, I develop an analytical framework based on insights from studies that identify ways through which ideas affect political interactions. In this section I will also address a common methodological question faced by those proposed to use an ideational approach to study political life: is an idea epiphenomenal to interest or are its effects autonomous? I argue for adopting a dynamic approach, whereby ideas and interests are conceptualized as factors that interact to provide opportunities for actors seeking to reform sensitive policy sectors.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.