How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public
Show Less

How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public

Policy Feedback, Participation, Voting, and Attitudes

Edited by Staffan Kumlin and Isabelle Stadelmann-Steffen

Staffan Kumlin and Isabelle Stadelmann-Steffen bring together political scientists and sociologists from different and frequently separated research communities to examine policy feedback in European welfare states. In doing so, they offer a rich menu of different methodological approaches. The book demonstrates how long-term policy legacies and short-term policy change affect the public, but also shows that such processes are contingent on individual characteristics and political context.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Waking up the giant? Hospital closures and electoral punishment in Sweden

Anders Lindbom


Paul Piersonís (1994) influential theory regarding the New Politics of the Welfare State (NP) argues that important parts of the electorate object to welfare retrenchment. This assumption is supported by attitude data that shows large support for social policy (Svallfors 1997, cf. Giger 2011). The theoretical implications are, firstly, that governments will tend to avoid such proposals and, secondly, that if they implement retrenchment anyway, they will typically be punished in the subsequent election. According to Giger (2011, p. 154), however, electoral punishment for welfare retrenchment ëis neither outstandingly harmful nor happening extremely oftení. Gigerís result can however be interpreted in different ways. Do people largely accept retrenchment despite their apparent support for the welfare state? Or would they punish politicians if the conditions were right? This chapter makes several contributions to the research on this topic. The theoretical contribution is to reemphasize that Piersonís conceptualization of retrenchment is relatively demanding and that NP only expects electoral punishment under certain conditions (which are unlikely to occur frequently). The empirical contribution is to show that in a strategically chosen setting, where these conditions are met and where retrenchment has this character, voter punishment indeed occurs. The Swedish electorate, and perhaps other electorates as well, are generally sleeping but not lifeless giants. The giant can be awoken.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.