Teaching Post Keynesian Economics
Show Less

Teaching Post Keynesian Economics

Edited by Jesper Jespersen and Mogens Ove Madsen

This book contends that post Keynesian economics has its own methodological and didactic basis, and its realistic analysis is much-needed in the current economic and financial crisis. At a time when the original message of Keynes’ General Theory is no longer present in the most university syllabuses, this book celebrates the uniqueness of teaching post Keynesian economics, providing comparisons with traditional economic rationale and illustrating the advantages of post Keynesian pedagogy.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: What about the mainstream critique of American principles of economics textbooks?

Poul Thøis Madsen


The financial crisis and the subsequent recession have been a real challenge to economists as well as to economic theory. In the media a blame game has been going on and economists and their theories have been portrayed as one of the main culprits. A repeated message has been that, had economic theories been of more relevance, we might have avoided the crisis, or at least not been taken so much by surprise.1 The economics textbook – as one important representative of economic theory – has also come under closer scrutiny and criticism due to the financial crisis (cf. Blinder 2010). Criticisms of economics textbooks do, however, go way back – certainly among non-mainstream economists, but perhaps more surprisingly, also among mainstream economists. I document in this chapter that a debate on modern textbooks has been going on for decades, culminating in the period 1987–1993, among mainstream economists who either write mainstream textbooks or teach from them. As self-criticism constitutes an important source of change for future editions of principles of economics textbooks we need to understand the character of the self-criticism, as well as why it has largely evaporated – as documented below. First I briefly pose some questions concerning why we should care about the theme raised in this chapter. Secondly, a number of methodological considerations related to my study are discussed, especially concerning operationalization and delimitation.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.