Edited by Frans Pennings and Gijsbert Vonk
Chapter 11: Women and social security
The central question for this chapter is whether the protection schemes of social security take sufficient account of (the position of) women. This question is approached historically, dividing the period of EEC/EU legislation and social policy making into two broad periods: the hard law period (1975–1990) when a small number of member states set themselves the task of cleansing their social security schemes of direct and indirect discrimination; and the period of gender mainstreaming and equal opportunity policies when the EU had become considerably larger and faith in hard law regulation had weakened. For the analysis the welfare state typology of Esping-Andersen is used, without neglecting the criticism this model provoked from feminist academics. A chapter in itself are the Central and Eastern European Countries who became member states after the fall of the Berlin Wall. In some of them the debate about what is best for women took an unexpected turn. Both elements – the critique of feminists of the welfare state typology of Esping-Andersen, and the approach of some CEECs of gender and social protection in the post-Communist period – illustrate both the complexity of the theme and the fact that it is not really possible to answer the central question unambiguously.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.