Show Less


Globalization’s New Urban Form?

Edited by John Harrison and Michael Hoyler

By critically assessing the opportunities and challenges posed by planning and governing at the megaregional scale, this innovative book examines the latest conceptualizations of trans-metropolitan landscapes. In doing so, it seeks to uncover whether megaregions are a meaningful new spatial framework for the analysis of cities in globalization. Situated within the broader contours of global urban analysis, the book draws together a range of thought-provoking contributions from scholars engaged in the study of trans-metropolitan regions. It thereby provides multiple paths of access for those wishing to familiarize themselves with this topical area of global urban studies.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Towards a megaregional future: analysing progress, assessing priorities in the US megaregion project

Billy Fleming


For the first time in recorded history the majority of the planet’s population resides in cities. In the United States alone, nearly two-thirds of Americans are projected to live in urbanized areas by the year 2050 (Yaro, 2005). This will not just be in urban centres, for ‘most of the nation’s population growth and an even larger share of its economic expansion will occur in ten or more emerging megaregions’ (Regional Plan Association, 2006, p. 12). As the US population migrates towards these urban regions, the 21st century is poised to become the ‘century of the city’ on both a national and a global scale (Peirce et al., 2008). The implications for this (re)inhabitation of the city are profound. Water resources will become increasingly stretched and denuded while aging and under-built infrastructural systems will need to be reconsidered in entirely new and innovative configurations. Meanwhile, the American promise of social mobility – seen by many to be dependent on access to quality education and high-wage employment – will become more and more difficult to fulfill. Complicating matters is what Rybczynski (2010) recently referred to as the ‘makeshift metropolis’, a term which can be considered in this context as a description for the fractious, often ad-hoc, nature of highly localized planning in the US.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.