Economic Crises and Policy Regimes
Show Less

Economic Crises and Policy Regimes

The Dynamics of Policy Innovation and Paradigmatic Change

Edited by Hideko Magara

In this innovative book, Hideko Magara brings together an expert team to explore both the possibilities and difficulties of transitioning from a neoliberal policy regime to an alternative regime through drastic policy innovations. The authors argue that, for more than two decades, citizens in developed countries have witnessed massive job losses, lowered wages, slow economic growth and widening inequality under a neoliberal policy regime that has placed heavy constraints on policy choices.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Choices and echoes: stability and change of policy regimes

Adam Przeworski


As one observes democratic governments in Western Europe since World War I, and elsewhere more recently, one notes periods when most governments, regardless of their partisan stripes, pursued similar economic policies, followed by sudden policy innovations, and again by periods when policies converged across partisan lines. Between the end of World War I and the 1930s, governments followed golden principles of the balanced budget, deflationary anti-crisis policies, gold standard and so on. Since everyone believed that capitalist economies obey natural laws, there was nothing anyone could do to counteract economic fluctuations. Socialists did want to nationalize industry but could not, since they held office only as minority governments or members of coalitions. And because for the bourgeois parties nationalization was an anathema, there were no nationalizations. The major innovation of social democrats was the idea that capitalist economies can be controlled by an active state. With the rise of Keynesianism, governments, regardless of partisan orientations, learned that they could counteract fluctuations of the capitalist economy by managing demand. They also found that by providing public goods and infrastructural investments, correcting for externalities and regulating natural monopolies, they could compensate for market inefficiencies. Finally, they came to believe that by subsidizing some investments and protecting some industries governments could promote growth. The major innovation of neoliberals was the claim that markets spontaneously maximize the welfare of society, or at least 'efficiency,' with only minimal regulation.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.