Juridification and Social Citizenship in the Welfare State
Show Less

Juridification and Social Citizenship in the Welfare State

Edited by Henriette Sinding Aasen, Siri Gloppen, Anne-Mette Magnussen and Even Nilssen

The concept of juridification refers to a diverse set of processes involving shifts towards more detailed legal regulation, regulations of new areas, and conflicts and problems increasingly being framed in legal and rights-oriented terms. This timely book questions the impact international and national regulations have upon vulnerable groups (the unemployed, patients, prisoners, immigrants, and others) in terms of inclusion, exclusion and social citizenship. Focusing on European welfare states, as well as lessons from Latin America, it considers the implementation of the right to health and the role of international courts. This book brings empirical analysis and multidisciplinary, comparative perspectives to the previously fragmented and largely theoretical debate on juridification in the welfare state.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: How legal professionals in the Netherlands and in Norway deal with cultural diversity (and how it affects social citizenship)

Wibo Van Rossum and Katja Jansen Fredriksen


Although the court understands that the father wishes to be involved in the upbringing of his son, the interests of the child need to come first. In the best interests of [the child] the court finds it therefore paramount to end the power battle between the parties. (Unpublished Dutch court decision regarding child custody, authors’ translation) The quotation above derives from an unpublished Dutch legal decision on a conflict within a Dutch Egyptian family, which was a prime example of cases in which the legal outcome is straightforward, while the underlying social and cultural conflict is very complex. In this chapter, we do not consider either the legal details of the case or the intricacies of Dutch private international law. Instead, we wish to focus on the interactions between legal professionals and lay parties in family conflicts in which more than one law is claimed to be valid. Legal professionals in the field (not only lawyers and judges but also advisers of bodies such as youth care organizations or ministries) show sensitivity for non-dominant values and behavior in such situations. This chapter is based on the hypothesis that the communications of legal professionals have an important impact on the legal consciousness of the parties and thus contribute to the subjectively felt citizenship of lay people in today’s culturally diverse society (Hernández 2010).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.