The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law
Show Less

The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law

Edited by Andrew D. Mitchell and Tania Voon

Tobacco use represents a critical global health challenge. The World Health Organization estimates that tobacco kills nearly 6 million people a year, with the toll expected to rise to 8 million annually over the next two decades. Written by health and legal experts from institutions around the globe, The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law examines the key areas of domestic and international law affecting the regulation of tobacco.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: Tobacco control in Australia: the High Court challenge to plain packaging

Mark Davison


The unsuccessful challenge to the tobacco plain packaging legislation (the TPP) based on the Australian Constitution obviously demonstrates the compliance of the TPP with Australian domestic law. In that sense, the effects of the decision are confined to Australia. However, a further and related issue is the extent to which a number of issues addressed in the course of the constitutional case affect international legal challenges to Australia’s plain packaging legislation. This chapter considers the decision of the High Court of Australia (Australia’s highest court) and relevant pleadings and arguments put to the High Court. In doing so, it analyses the potential impact of various aspects of the litigation on the arbitration proceedings between Australia and Philip Morris Asia Limited (PMA). At the outset, it should be recognised that there are some difficulties associated with identifying the precise impact of the decision. The seven High Court justices wrote six different judgments, none of which referred directly to any of the other judgments. The six justices in the majority wrote five separate judgments, with only Hayne and Bell JJ writing a joint judgment. As the case turned on a very specific provision of the Australian Constitution, a number of justices unsurprisingly focused on that provision and did not address some tangential issues in any great detail. However, some important propositions can be distilled from the judgments with considerable certainty, and some but not total elucidation of other relevant propositions has been provided.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.