Legal Innovations in Asia
Show Less

Legal Innovations in Asia

Judicial Lawmaking and the Influence of Comparative Law

Edited by John O. Haley and Toshiko Takenaka

Legal Innovations in Asia explores how law in Asia has developed over time as a result of judicial interpretation and innovations drawn from the legal systems of foreign countries. Expert scholars from around the world offer a history of law in the region while also providing a wider context for present-day Asian law. The contributors share insightful perspectives on comparative law, the role of courts, legal transplants, intellectual property, Islamic law and other issues as they relate to the practice and study of law in Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea and Southeast Asia.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 1.1: The first decades, 1961–2000

John O. Haley


The Asian Law Center commenced as the Asian Law Program in 1961 with receipt of the first of two foundational grants from the Ford Foundation. A year later, in 1962, the appointment of Dan Fenno Henderson as director fully launched the Program as the first center established outside of East Asia for research and teaching on East Asian Law and the only one ever to be established with a primary focus on Japanese law. Henderson, a 1944 Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Whitman College, had studied Japanese at the U.S. Army Japanese Language School at the University of Michigan. After brief service in Occupied Japan, he enrolled in the Harvard Law School, graduating in 1949 with his first degree in law. He practiced law briefly in Seattle but decided to continue his study of Japan and Japanese law, earning a Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of California, Berkeley in 1955. He was licensed that year to practice law in Japan (and subsequently South Korea) and became a partner of Graham & James in its Tokyo Office. He left active practice in 1962 to become first a consultant to and then director of the Asian Law Program. As an academic lawyer Henderson envisioned a program to equip “liaison” lawyers to deal professionally with trans-Pacific transactions, which at the time meant a primary focus on Japanese law.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.