Legal Innovations in Asia
Show Less

Legal Innovations in Asia

Judicial Lawmaking and the Influence of Comparative Law

Edited by John O. Haley and Toshiko Takenaka

Legal Innovations in Asia explores how law in Asia has developed over time as a result of judicial interpretation and innovations drawn from the legal systems of foreign countries. Expert scholars from around the world offer a history of law in the region while also providing a wider context for present-day Asian law. The contributors share insightful perspectives on comparative law, the role of courts, legal transplants, intellectual property, Islamic law and other issues as they relate to the practice and study of law in Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea and Southeast Asia.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 1.2: Navigating law’s “Asian Century”

Veronica L. Taylor


The challenge of “the Asian Century” for a law school such as the University of Washington (UW) is how to pursue its public service mission, “Leadership for the Global Common Good,” while also achieving more pragmatic institutional aims, in an increasingly complex world. International and comparative law scholars of 50 years ago imagined a simpler legal geography: sovereign domestic legal systems at different stages of development, overlaid with a light blanket of international law.Those were largely fictional taxonomies of how legal systems are constituted, but they remain remarkably robust. In this century, the legal world looks more kaleidoscopic. The imperatives of legal education are framed by individuals, corporations, governments or NGOs, and also by whether the activity is taking place in the Pacific Northwest, or more widely on national or international stages. What remains in focus, however, is that this century’s world population centers and engines for economic growth are located in “Asia,” however we define it. So the question is: how do legal educational institutions such as UW navigate law’s Asian century? Where can a law school do well, by doing good? What principles would we use to make those choices? As a publically located and increasingly privately funded law school, UW earns the right to make strategic choices through a “social license” – that is, the legitimacy that different kinds of stakeholders confer on the enterprise.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.