Legal Innovations in Asia
Show Less

Legal Innovations in Asia

Judicial Lawmaking and the Influence of Comparative Law

Edited by John O. Haley and Toshiko Takenaka

Legal Innovations in Asia explores how law in Asia has developed over time as a result of judicial interpretation and innovations drawn from the legal systems of foreign countries. Expert scholars from around the world offer a history of law in the region while also providing a wider context for present-day Asian law. The contributors share insightful perspectives on comparative law, the role of courts, legal transplants, intellectual property, Islamic law and other issues as they relate to the practice and study of law in Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea and Southeast Asia.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3.2: The Supreme Court of Japan and online pharmacies

Shigenori Matsui


It is a well-known fact that the Supreme Court of Japan has developed a conservative and restrained constitutional jurisprudence. The Supreme Court of Japan is often reluctant to strike down statutes passed by the Diet, or Japan’s national legislature, on constitutional grounds. But this does not mean that the Supreme Court of Japan categorically avoids judgments that might have a significant impact on society. Indeed, the Supreme Court of Japan has handed down a number of judgments with far-reaching social implications. Its decisions on consumer lending are a classic example. In these decisions, the Supreme Court of Japan allowed millions of consumers to claim refunds for excessive interest payments, thereby causing the collapse and subsequent widespread reorganization of the consumer lending business. However, the Supreme Court of Japan has rendered other judgments with significant social implications. One such judgment, the focus of this chapter, overturned the ban on online sales of over-the-counter drugs, which radically liberalized the online sale of drugs. This chapter describes the background for that decision and lays out the statutory and regulatory framework for the regulation of pharmacy and online sales of drugs. It then traces the history of litigation against a ban on online sales of drugs and examines the basic reasoning of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Japan. Finally, this chapter explores the judgment’s social and political implications, illustrating the Supreme Court of Japan’s willingness, in some cases, to change the course of society and politics through its judgments.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.