Legal Innovations in Asia
Show Less

Legal Innovations in Asia

Judicial Lawmaking and the Influence of Comparative Law

Edited by John O. Haley and Toshiko Takenaka

Legal Innovations in Asia explores how law in Asia has developed over time as a result of judicial interpretation and innovations drawn from the legal systems of foreign countries. Expert scholars from around the world offer a history of law in the region while also providing a wider context for present-day Asian law. The contributors share insightful perspectives on comparative law, the role of courts, legal transplants, intellectual property, Islamic law and other issues as they relate to the practice and study of law in Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea and Southeast Asia.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3.5: The role of courts in “making” Islamic law: South and Southeast Asia

Clark B. Lombardi


Many chapters in this volume explore how Asian courts have been usurping the traditional prerogatives of legislatures and bureaucracies and are finding ways to “make law.” In this chapter, I will discuss what may seem an even more startling phenomenon. Judges in South and Southeast Asia are not merely poaching on the traditional turf of legislators and bureaucrats. They are sometimes poaching as well on the traditional turf of religious scholars. Until fairly recently, Sunni Muslims believed that interpretive authority in questions of religious law lay with scholars trained in the classical Islamic sciences and that this authority was located primarily outside the judiciary. Thus, when faced with open questions of Islamic law, judges were generally expected to seek an advisory opinion from eminent independent scholars. Once the private scholars had provided an interpretation of the law, judges would apply this rule to the case at bar. Today, however, in some parts of Muslim Asia, judges do not rely on religious scholars to interpret Islamic law or to identify new rules where Islamic law has hitherto been silent. Particularly in constitutional courts, many judges who do not have classical religious training are refusing to defer to scholarly opinions about the law. Rather, these judges are developing and applying rules of Islamic law that they are developing for themselves. In this chapter, I will explore how this phenomenon developed and how it has been manifesting itself in three countries in Muslim Asia. I will also briefly consider some of the implications of this development.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.