Legal Innovations in Asia
Show Less

Legal Innovations in Asia

Judicial Lawmaking and the Influence of Comparative Law

Edited by John O. Haley and Toshiko Takenaka

Legal Innovations in Asia explores how law in Asia has developed over time as a result of judicial interpretation and innovations drawn from the legal systems of foreign countries. Expert scholars from around the world offer a history of law in the region while also providing a wider context for present-day Asian law. The contributors share insightful perspectives on comparative law, the role of courts, legal transplants, intellectual property, Islamic law and other issues as they relate to the practice and study of law in Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea and Southeast Asia.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3.7: Goddess of justice without a blindfold: How do Japanese judges treat pro se litigants?


It is often pointed out that Japanese judges exercise strength of initiative over parties in the case management of civil proceedings regardless of the fact that the Japanese Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) does not provide court contempt or any other strong sanctions. In fact, in addition to providing the general authority to control court proceedings, the CCP provides judges with the authority to clarify facts through the questioning of parties and to recommend settlement, and these provisions legitimize the judges’ strong leader - ship in proceedings in Japan. A topic of discourse among practitioners, one explanation for this practice is that there are many cases in which one party or both parties are pro se litigants (a party without a representing attorney), and therefore judges have to exercise strong leadership over the parties so that the proceedings go smoothly and efficiently. There had been, however, no quantitative survey on how Japanese judges actually treated pro se litigants until the Legal Research and Training Institute under the Supreme Court of Japan conducted a survey on pro se litigation for the first time in 2011. While there have been several surveys conducted in Japan about Japanese civil procedure from the litigants’ point of view, the significant feature of this survey was that the respondents were professional judges who were actually handling pro se litigation. The survey collected 285 samples in total and presented the first empirical foothold in the discussion about case management of pro se litigation in Japanese courts.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.