Legal Innovations in Asia
Show Less

Legal Innovations in Asia

Judicial Lawmaking and the Influence of Comparative Law

Edited by John O. Haley and Toshiko Takenaka

Legal Innovations in Asia explores how law in Asia has developed over time as a result of judicial interpretation and innovations drawn from the legal systems of foreign countries. Expert scholars from around the world offer a history of law in the region while also providing a wider context for present-day Asian law. The contributors share insightful perspectives on comparative law, the role of courts, legal transplants, intellectual property, Islamic law and other issues as they relate to the practice and study of law in Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea and Southeast Asia.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4.1: The inf luence of Japanese law on Taiwan law


Taiwan law means, in this chapter, the law existing in Taiwan since 1895, when Taiwan became a colony in the prewar Japanese Empire. The periods of Dutch and Spanish rule (1624–1662) and Koxinga regime’s rule (1661–1683) were so short in Taiwan’s history that the ruled had not yet shaped their own political identity. For the next 212 years (1683–1895), Taiwan was ruled by a local government of imperial China and there was almost no Taiwanese political or cultural identity during that time. However, since 1895 a modern-style legal system was brought to Taiwan by the Japanese colonialists. More importantly, Taiwan became a specific jurisdiction within the whole Japanese empire, having its own laws and court system different from that of metropolitan Japan. The term, and concept of, “Taiwan law” thus emerged. Although Taiwan was regarded as a province of Republican China between 1945 and 1949, Taiwan has been constituted a de facto independent state since 1949, as mentioned below. Therefore, the law in Taiwan, officially named the Republic of China (“ROC”) law, can be called “Taiwan law” in the international community. Taiwan law is a member of the civil law family, of which the sources of positive law are statutes. The provisions in statutes are in essence the products of the legislature, in which various political forces make their compromise; however, they are written by legal terminology and often need to be interpreted for general application to individual cases in accordance with legal theories.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.