Contributions to Disciplinary Thought
Edited by Jean d’Aspremont and Sahib Singh
Chapter 36: Interpretivism
Interpretivists seek to provide an explanatory account of shared practices (that is, the international legal order) by rationally reconstructing the motivations of participants within such practices. The international legal theories of Weil, Oppenheim and the Policy Science School apply an interpretive method, similar to Weber’s, to the study of international law. Dworkin’s general legal theory, called ‘constructive interpretation’, was considered in relation to international law in his final work. Lauterpacht’s ‘progressive interpretation’, developed in the 1930s, offers a philosophy of international law which is very similar to that of Dworkin. These approaches are set out and explored in what follows. Moreover, it is suggested that interpretivist method was explored and endorsed in international law (many years before it was developed in general legal theory) because it offered a plausible and robust method by which a single international legal order could be forged from disparate fragments of international and diplomatic practice.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.