Contributions to Disciplinary Thought
Edited by Jean d’Aspremont and Sahib Singh
Chapter 46: Precedent
The concept of precedent challenges some of the legal foundations of international adjudication. In particular, it questions the dogma according to which there is no stare decisis within the system of international courts and tribunals. From the birth of third party adjudication to the present day, international courts and tribunals have shaped, progressively and discontinuously, a doctrine of precedent. In that process, precedent has appeared sometimes as a legal necessity, sometimes as a tool for consistency and coherence (that is, as an ‘antifragmentation’ device) and, often, as an ideology. However, the contours of the concept of precedent vary depending on the international courts and tribunals. While some of them are cautious about the use of judicial precedents, others engage in judicial activism and, to a certain extent, judicial legislation in order to legitimize the systematic use of precedents in the peaceful settlement of international disputes. There is no doubt that the concept of precedent is a child of the century – a century marked by the ‘judicialization’ of international law.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.