Contributions to Disciplinary Thought
Edited by Jean d’Aspremont and Sahib Singh
Chapter 48: Reason
In contemporary legal thought, it is frequently claimed or simply presumed that reason rules or ought to rule. But if this view is to be more than a conceit, it would be necessary for legal thinkers to address the challenges that reason confronts when faced with a law whose authorities, aesthetics and self-idealization seem resistant to reason. That sort of encounter simply has not happened in any serious way. Based on a close reading of crucial passages in Ronald Dworkin’s Law’s Empire, this chapter shows how instead the ‘partisans of reason’ elide challenges to reason through a characteristic reductionism and purification of law. This rhetorical elision is ultimately a betrayal of reason itself. Predictably, it yields an enchantment of reason.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.