Handbook of Biology and Politics
Show Less

Handbook of Biology and Politics

Edited by Steven A. Peterson and Albert Somit

The study of biology and politics (or biopolitics) has gained considerable currency in recent years, as articles on the subject have appeared in mainstream journals and books on the subject have been well received. The literature has increased greatly since the 1960s and 1970s, when this specialization first made an appearance. This volume assesses the contributions of biology to political science. Chapters focus on general biological approaches to politics, biopolitical contributions to mainstream areas within political science, and linkages between biology and public policy. The volume provides readers with a comprehensive introduction to the subject.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 19: Observational research methods and politics

Bobbie J. Foster and Patrick A. Stewart

Abstract

This chapter examines the advantages and drawbacks of using observational research in political science and associated academic fields. We argue that observational research provides researchers with more valid and reliable measures of human behavior that would otherwise be difficult to assess, especially when considering political behavior within groups or in response to outsiders. Furthermore, observational research of proximate behavior can be linked with physiological adaptations that have ultimate evolutionary explanations. Specifically, observational research relies on more static cues of behavioral capacity and signals of behavioral intent through non-verbal cues. However, such research is not without its disadvantages. For example, even with pervasive video technologies, researchers are at the mercy of what the camera captures. At the same time, this method of study is also highly time-consuming due to the need to develop and apply theoretically and practically applicable coding methods and tools. However, with digital media inundating the public, it is important to use methods that can account for not just verbal communication, but also the often more reliable non-verbal behavior. We provide an application of observational research methods through a case study of Lance Armstrong’s interview with Oprah Winfrey when he discussed his performance-enhancing drug use. Here, we examine a range of non-verbal behaviors displayed by Armstrong in response to questions by Winfrey including his eye blink rate, hand-to-mouth gestures, and the voiced or unvoiced laughter evoked or emitted in response to difficult questions. Although this study is not directly political, it has applications and insights for interviewers, whether in the mass media or in public, non-profit or private organizations.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.