Research Handbook on Climate Change and Trade Law
Show Less

Research Handbook on Climate Change and Trade Law

Edited by Panagiotis Delimatsis

The interaction between climate change and trade has grown in prominence in recent years. This Research Handbook contains authoritative original contributions from leading experts working at the interface between trade and climate change. It maps the state of affairs in such diverse areas as: carbon credits and taxes, sustainable standard-setting and trade in ‘green’ goods and services or investment, from both a regional and global perspective. Panagiotis Delimatsis redefines the interrelationship of trade and climate change for future scholarship in this area.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 18: Climate change and investor-state dispute settlement: identifying the linkages

Angelos Dimopoulos


This chapter examines how investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) influences the balance between investment protection and climate change¬. It looks first at the jurisdiction of investment tribunals and remedies available under ISDS, in order to explain when and what kind of claims investors can raise, and who can participate in arbitral proceedings. Second, this chapter critically reviews applicable law in investment arbitration, and the role of environmental law rules and principles therein. It is argued that ISDS limited jurisdiction to determine only whether there has been a violation of investment law provisions does not pose a systemic “threat” to climate change protection, since tribunals cannot make authoritative findings on the existence of environmental harm. On the contrary, investment tribunals tend increasingly to pay due consideration to national or international law rules on climate change and show deference to host states when the latter provide evidence supporting the legality of climate change-related measures. Besides, investment tribunals can indirectly address potential environmental harm caused by investors by excluding them from the scope of investment protection, or take their conduct into account in the merits or in the calculation of damages. Finally, although ISDS has been heavily criticized for not allowing third parties to participate in proceedings, a growing number of arbitration rules and investment treaties enable the submission of amici curiae, that presents a first positive step towards strengthening inclusiveness and legitimacy of ISDS.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.